4Rank 04 of 8 · Best Running Shoes for Beginners

Hoka Hoka Clifton 11

The best breathability here at 93/100 and the only shoe with narrow through extra-wide fittings genuinely stocked in Europe. The midsole is conventional EVA with the lowest measured energy return of the group.

Hoka Hoka Clifton 11 — product photo 8.4BPR score
good
  1. €118Price
  2. 266 g (RunRepeat lab)Lab-measured weight
  3. 4 of 8in Best Running Shoes for Beginners
  4. 8.4BPR score 0–10

Review

What this product is

Written after the analysis, from the same sources the score is built on: the manufacturer's documentation, available studies and verified owner feedback.

Two things make this the right shoe for specific people, and both are practical rather than performance-related.

Breathability measured 93 out of 100 — the best in this ranking — with 62% drying potential. If you run in Spain, Italy or southern France in summer, or if your feet run hot, this is a materially different experience from the Brooks at 70 or the Asics Nimbus at 64.

And Hoka's German site offers normal, wide and extra-wide fittings — the only brand in this ranking with genuine width availability in Europe. RunRepeat lists wide options for several shoes here, but those listings reflect the US market; when we checked actual European brand sites, Asics offered standard only, Puma regular only, Decathlon standard only, and Brooks via its German retailer medium only. If you have wide feet in Europe, this is where to start.

The lab numbers are mixed. RunRepeat measured 266 g against a 258 g claim, stack 41.4 / 29.7 mm giving an 11.7 mm drop against 8 mm official. The midsole is CMEVA — compression-moulded EVA, a conventional foam, not supercritical — measuring 31.1 AC, comfortably soft. Energy return is 46.8% heel and 50.1% forefoot, the lowest measured here, which is consistent with EVA: RunRepeat's own guide puts EVA at 47–54% and premium foams at 74–82%.

Outsole is 3.2 mm rubber with excellent 0.9 mm wear. But forefoot traction measured 0.52, the lowest in this group — worth knowing given European autumn road conditions.

RunRepeat scored it 85/100 "Great", describing it as best for easy-paced daily running with an outdated foam limiting faster paces. For a beginner running easy paces, that limitation is irrelevant.

Technical data

Specification

Figures from the manufacturer's documentation, verified against available outside sources. Values we could not confirm are marked as declared.

Lab weight
266 g (RunRepeat; brand claims 258 g)
Lab stack
41.4 mm heel / 29.7 mm forefoot
Lab drop
11.7 mm (official 8 mm)
Midsole
CMEVA - compression-moulded EVA, conventional foam
Midsole softness
31.1 AC - soft
Energy return
46.8% heel / 50.1% forefoot - lowest here
Outsole
3.2 mm rubber, 0.9 mm Dremel wear
Forefoot traction
0.52 - lowest in this group
Breathability
93/100 - best here, 62% drying potential
Toebox width
70.9 mm
Widths on hoka.com/de
Normal, Wide, X-Wide
Plate
None
Price
EUR 160 RRP; from EUR 118 street

Component scores

Where the score
comes from.

Four components, equal weight, each on a 0–10 scale and each resting on a named source. The overall score is their mean — the full procedure is in the methodology.

  1. Composition and specification8.0

    Declared composition and specification: active ingredients and their concentrations, energy classes, standards, technical parameters — and what the manufacturer leaves unsaid.

  2. Evidence and studies8.5

    Verification of the manufacturer's claims against outside sources: laboratory reports, industry testing, safety data sheets, certificates and regulatory decisions.

  3. Owner feedback8.8

    Analysis of verified reviews written after extended use, together with recurring fault reports for the model or series.

  4. Cost and value8.3

    Price set against what the product actually delivers, plus costs incurred later — consumables, energy, servicing, subscriptions — over the lifespan typical for the category.

Overall score = mean of four component scoresSignificance threshold: ±0.15 pt

What we liked

  • Breathability 93/100 — the best in this ranking
  • Normal, wide and extra-wide fittings genuinely stocked in Europe
  • Soft midsole at 31.1 AC
  • 0.9 mm Dremel wear — excellent outsole durability
  • MetaRocker geometry and Active Foot Frame aid an easy rolling gait
  • Street price around €118 against €160 RRP

Worth knowing

  • Conventional CMEVA foam with the lowest energy return here (46.8% heel)
  • Forefoot traction 0.52, the lowest measured in this group
  • Measured drop 11.7 mm against 8 mm official
  • 266 g against a 258 g brand claim
  • Heel counter stiffness only 3/5
8.4 Good Rank 04 of 8 · Best Running Shoes for Beginners

Comparison

How it compares
within the category

All values come from the same analysis and are comparable only within the category Best Running Shoes for Beginners.

Comparison with the category leaders
ProductScoreLab-measured weightPrice
Puma Velocity Nitro 5Top score 8.9242 g (RTINGS lab) €130
Hoka Clifton 11This product 8.4266 g (RunRepeat lab) €118
Category average8 products analysed 8.2——

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Does low energy return matter for a beginner?

Almost not at all. Energy return is measured with a mechanical drop test — a mass dropped onto the midsole — and RunRepeat's own guidance is that most of the energy a shoe returns "simply helps it spring back into shape rather than pushing you forward". The gap between 47% and 62% shows up, if at all, at paces a new runner will not be holding. Comfort and fit will affect your running far more.

I have wide feet. What are my options in Europe?

Start here — Hoka's German site is the only one in this ranking offering normal, wide and extra-wide. Be careful with review sites that list width options: those listings usually reflect US availability. Of the eight shoes here, on actual European brand sites we found Asics standard only, Puma regular only, Decathlon standard only, Brooks medium only at its German retailer, and Nike normal plus wide.

Principles

The manufacturer makes claims.
We check what the evidence says.

Every ranking follows the same protocol: an analysis of composition and specification, verification of claims against available studies, a review of verified owner feedback, and an assessment of price against what the product delivers.

No sponsored content · no paid placements